From the Blog

Hey fans – here’s a preview of the back-cover blurb for Too Hard to Handle, still slated for October release:

Running for the rest of your life isn’t a plan …

The last time Mara Cunningham saw her older brother Jimmy was ten years ago, when he jumped bail after robbing a bank in Salem. Tonight, he showed up on surveillance footage at the scene of a police officer’s murder.

Now every cop in Boston wants his head. Every gangster in the city wants the money he stole. And Mara wants answers to the questions Jimmy ran from. But she’ll have to find him first.

Too bad Jimmy Cunningham has plans of his own …

TOO HARD TO HANDLE is the second book in the Mara Cunningham series. It follows Boston’s most dangerous photographer as she solves mysteries, uncovers corruption and busts some heads. It’s dark, gritty and action-packed.

Praise for the Mara Cunningham series

“Strong, flawed, independent female lead [...] ? Check. Political intrigue and conspiracy? Check. Cast of characters that get just enough page time to whet your appetite for future stories? Checkmate. Somebody option this quick.” – Jeremy Lott, Splice Today

When I announced that Too Close to Miss was on sale, I also made it available as a free .pdf. Word of mouth is more important to me than revenue at this stage, so I wanted as many people as possible to read it. I also wanted to show consideration for people who didn’t have a Kindle, Nook or iPad yet. (There is a print version coming soon, I promise)

Last week, I quietly took down the free PDF from the site. The initial burst seemed to have slowed. At this point, people were more likely to discover the book through Amazon, B&N or iTunes than through my blog.

So, thank you to everyone who downloaded the .pdf, read it, and spread the word about the book.

What I learned from my little experiment:


  • First, get a good download tracker if you’re going to try a stunt like this. Google Analytics will tell you that it’s easy to track downloads of a file – just paste some Javascript into the link, set up a Conversion point in your Goal Funnel, and voila! It is not, in fact, that easy. I will never get mad at a client for delay in putting tracking pixels on their website ever again.

  • If you’re unwilling or unable to do that, then have fun deciphering access logs! I was able to get the raw access data in .csv format from my web host. I then pasted it into Excel, separated out the IP addresses, and filtered out duplicates, since a given IP address might “call” a page more than once in a short time.

  • The result? 125 people* downloaded the free .pdf of my novel between December 2nd and December 21st. Again, thank you all!

How do those numbers fare?

Honestly, I’m happy with it. I’ve sold somewhat more than 125 copies of the book each on Amazon and Barnes & Noble. Presuming a 1% conversion rate of “reader” to “fan,” I can expect somewhere between one to two fans: people who will proselytize about the book to their social network, which can in turn lead to more sales, which can in turn lead to more fans, etc. Since every fan is precious – I blush at each new Amazon review – I consider it a worthwhile investment.

I don’t count the 125 downloads as lost sales, either. While $0.99 isn’t much of an obstacle to trying me out, I recognize that “free” is even more appealing. There are people who downloaded the .pdf who would never be ebook sales, whether due to platform difficulties or different price points. Besides, at a 30-40% royalty on $0.99, the $45 I (conceivably) lost on free downloads is a worthwhile investment if it produces one fan.

Of course, this is all a grand experiment. It’s all part of my fumbling, newborn efforts to market myself as a writer. And as my CEO told me once, no marketing campaign is truly a failure. You learn something from every dollar you spend**. So I’m happy to learn, and I’m happy to share what I’m learning.

_________________
* “People” in the Internet definition of the word. It’s possible that a given user may have accessed the file from two different IP addresses, but this is a possibility that afflicts any tracking program.

** Even if it’s “don’t color our regular cola cans the same shade as our diet cola cans, even if it’s Christmas“.

One of the most rewarding parts of ceaselessly promoting a (good) novel has been seeing feedback. I don’t expect everyone to love Too Close to Miss – it’s very brief and it’s written in a particular noirish style that doesn’t work for everyone. But the feedback I’ve seen so far has been very encouraging.

(That’s one of the beauties of social media and the digital distribution era: I can get an instant assessment of how I’m doing. Of course, if I weren’t doing as well, that would turn into instant criticism, so I’m still compelled to give this my all)

I’ve taken a lot of pull quotes and turned them into promotional material for the book; you can click through to the Amazon.com description to see some of them. But my absolute favorite quotes so far have been quotes I can’t use.

For instance:

I didn’t think anything could drag me away from Skyrim for more than twenty minutes, but from chapter one, I couldn’t put the damn thing down.” – from a friend who works for BioWare. That’s fantastic validation right there, but my target audience isn’t going to appreciate the importance of dragging someone away from Skyrim. If this were a Cory Doctorow thriller, maybe.

My mom is loving your novel.” – speaking of target audiences … since most novels, especially in the thriller genre, are bought by women, it’s really important to me that I resonate with the 35+ female demographic. And I’ve heard this more than once, so it’s reassuring!

And my favorite:

It’s so nice to see a self-published book whose first page doesn’t make me want to scratch out my eyes.

If you have kind words and coronets of your own, please leave them on the Amazon page for the book, or even the Goodreads page. The indie publishing revolution has, as both a bug and a feature, flooded the market with product. Standing out in the crowd requires good word of mouth from trusted sources. If you read a lot of indie product, you know how hard it is to find something good – and if you think my stuff is good, please spread the word!

Thoreau had a post up on Unqualified Offerings yesterday re: terrorism. I don’t want to talk about terrorism since it’s too nice a day out, but he did use a humorous metaphor to make a point about terrorist recruitment …

I mean, Fear Factor got 6 attractive, physically fit, confident people who could have made far more money in personal training or sales to eat live spiders week after week for a mere $50k! (Incidentally, in a further sign that Hollywood has zero new ideas, Wikipedia says that a reboot is imminent.)

… that I addressed in comments and wanted to echo here.

In picking contestants for Fear Factor, attractiveness wasn’t a coincidence. “Wow, all six of these people photograph really well; what are the odds?” It was a necessary criterion. Producers won’t let you on TV without it.

Attractiveness was far more important than courage, in fact. You don’t want someone who can fearlessly eat spiders on camera. There’s no tension there. It’s not hard to find someone who’ll eat spiders. Go to any traveling circus that still has a geek tent. What you want, instead, is someone who will squirm and go pale, sweat making their immaculate bangs cling to their unblemished forehead, as they lift the bug to their mouth.

I make a point of it because it’s a common Bayesian error in evaluating the composition of a group. Make sure you know what the group was actually being selected for. The ostensible marketing ain’t it; take it from one who knows.

And finally, because I can never pass up a chance to quote Chesterton:

“Now, really, I know of no occupation for which mere willingness is the final test.”

“I do. Martyrs. I am sending you to your death. Good day.”

- The Man Who Was Thursday

The longer I work in marketing, the less comfortable I am with “eighteen to thirty-five” as a demographic. I wouldn’t want to spend 2 minutes in an elevator with most 20-year-olds, and I have to spend another 5 years in the same demo as them? There’s nothing I have in common with them aside from a lack of kids (though, as my friend Jason pointed out, people of any age without kids have more in common than people of the same age if one of them has a child, and try booking a weekend on the beach if you don’t believe me).

Of course, the beauty of Google knowing everything is that marketers no longer have to rely on broad segments dreamed up by Madison Avenue. Soccer moms, job-hopping millennials, gadget junkies, green fanatics: you no longer need to buy a bucket before you go fishing. That’s one of Internet Inc’s chief strengths: defining segments based on the behavior of your existing customers, rather than deciding “your car appeals to do-it-yourself dads” and spending $2MM of your money to find out we were wrong. So if marketing gets smarter – something I’m trying to prod it to do every day, guys, really – I won’t be in this eighteen-to-thirty-five bucket for long.

This came up, oddly, as part of my rediscovery of the golden age of hip-hop, that magical period between 1986 and 1994 when everyone sampled Motown, conscious styles dominated and lyrical flow was at its peak. As a white kid from the suburbs I was conscious of almost none of it. But that spark lay in the back of my mind until it started burning. I’ve been using Spotify to tear through the tracks I should have listened to back in the day. Tribe Called Quest. Gang Starr. Pete Rock and C.L. Smooth.

This was not the soundtrack to my teenage years. But it could have been. The Main Ingredient dropped in ’94, and at the tender age of 13 I was susceptible to fresh cuts and jams. But someone who is 18 today would have been neonatal back then. If “Carmel City” had any impact on their lives, it would have been purely subconscious. They wouldn’t relate to it in the same way I would have. That, in part, is why the eighteen-to-thirty-five demo doesn’t work.

Also, do you have any idea how jarring it is to be kicking it to The Main Ingredient and be interrupted by a Trace Adkins ad, Spotify? Marketing needs to get its act together.

Fellow marketroid Liz Caradonna wrote a blog post on how to be an improviser on Facebook, a post itself inspired by another excellent article on why your friends are not (or shouldn’t be) your fans. The advice therein doesn’t just apply to improvisers. It’s useful to any performer, or any form of creative business, or anything where self-promotion through social media is SOP.

Spamming your friends is not only poor life etiquette; it’s also one of the least effective ways to promote your work and your shows. Because you know who’s receiving all of these notifications? ME. THE BUSY IMPROVISER WITH 500 OTHER IMPROVISER FRIENDS. You are tagging, inviting and notifying all of the people who are being tagged, invited and notified by every other improviser they know. They are currently invited to 22 improv shows taking place in the next week, and they don’t even live in the same city where half of those shows are happening. They are not RSVPing to these invites; I’d be amazed if they’re even reading them. Everybody’s over-spammed and nobody cares.

You should take 15 minutes to read both of them. But if you only have time for one, read Liz’s. It’s full of practical advice in clear language. It spells out the ways that self-promotion can make you an asshole. It’s good stuff.

I agree with every single word of it except for the conclusion.

Liz’s point is that promoting your work by messaging all of your friends, creating events that everyone gets invited to, and asking everyone to “Like” your fan page, is kind of an asshole move. That is beyond dispute. Doing this doesn’t make you an asshole, but it’s asshole behavior.

And yet.

Our Next EP, “The Object Lesson”
I know a guy named Mark plays keyboard and guitar for a band called The Brother Kite. They’re based out of Providence, about ninety minutes south of where I live. That’s sixty minutes farther than my private mental window of how far I’ll go to see a friend’s band. It’s not that I don’t like Mark. He’s great! We always have fun when he comes up to visit. But I have a lot of friends in bands, or in plays, or in improv shows, and if I go ninety minutes out of my way to see all of them my body will disintegrate.

Last Friday, TBK was playing downstairs at the Middle East, one of Cambridge’s better rock clubs. The Middle East is about a fifteen minute ride on the T from where I live. I had a free evening. And the Middle East is a prestigious enough venue that it’d be worth supporting a friend there. So, for the first time ever, I went to see The Brother Kite.

And it turns out they’re good! Good enough that I hit up the merch table afterward and picked up their latest album, which I almost never do.

Here’s the point: Mark has been messaging me about his band across various media for at least four years. I have ignored every invitation he’s sent until this most recent one. And then it finally paid off, because I’m now a fan. A legitimate fan. I am not a fan of all of my performer friends, but I’m a fan of The Brother Kite. And it took four persistent years of unapologetic messaging to get me here.

I pick Mark as an example because of recency, but there are others I could use. As a friend and supporter of ImprovBoston, I’m swamped in regular invites to come see someone’s improv, sketch or stand-up performances. What determines the ones I go to see? The ones that I’m thinking about when I have a free evening. What determines which show I’m thinking about? A lot of things, but the frequency with which I hear about it definitely helps.

Liz’s point is that spamming your friends is asshole behavior. My point is that, if you want to get word out there, you have to be an asshole.

Famous Assholes of History
I’ve made this point before, in talking about Tim Ferriss’s Four-Hour Work Week and how Tim Ferriss is an asshole:

All great motivators are assholes. They have to be. A great motivator cannot let you sit where you are. You have a thousand excuses to keep doing things the way you’re doing them; he has to tell you they’re all bullshit. He has to get you uncomfortable. Change requires change; it’s not something you can do from your armchair.

Gandhi was an asshole (“stop buying British-made clothes? sure, Bupu”). Dr. Martin Luther King was an asshole (“I already gave $10 to the NAACP; you want me to take a fire hose to the face too?”). Anthony Robbins is an asshole – he tells an anecdote in Awaken The Giant Within about encouraging a chocolate addict at one of his seminars to go ahead! stuff your face! eat as much chocolate as you like! And he did for two days’ straight, got miserable and never touched the stuff again.

Tim Ferriss is no different.

I’m not going to win any points comparing your improv show to the quest for black civil rights in the U.S. (unless it’s a really good Armando). But getting people off the couch and into your audience takes persistence. You need to impress yourself upon them enough to be front of mind when they turn to their significant others and ask, “Hey, what should we do on Thursday?”

If you want people to choose your art, you have to be a bit of an asshole about it.

Don’t Mind Me
I stress this not because I want to be bombarded by more invites to shows I won’t see (though if I didn’t, would it stop you?). I stress this because I’m a tremendous introvert. Many of the artists I know are, if not introverts, very insecure. They harbor a lot of doubts about how they appear to others. They want to be liked and they spend a lot of time thinking about how to be more liked.

I believe that promotion is one of the most crucial variables in determining whether an artist succeeds or fails. And I think telling insecure people, “Don’t use these means to promote yourself,” is the worst thing they could hear. They don’t need another reason not to talk about their passion. They already have a hundred.

Cost vs. Yield
On the grand scale of promotion, spamming your friends is low cost and low yield. You message 500 of your Facebook friends about your open-mic night at P.A.’s Lounge. Maybe five of them show up. Of those five, one is impressed enough to become a genuine fan. Not a “fan” as Facebook calls it, but a fan in the conventional sense: an enthusiast, advocate and patron. This is low cost (Create Event, Invite Guests, Select All) and low performance (0.2% “fandom” rate).

(There’s also the added noise pollution of one more invite in your inbox, but that’s a negative externality which the performer doesn’t bear the brunt of)

At the other end of the scale, you have more restrained efforts. You create a mailing list that’s opt-in, rather than opt-out. You notify friends but don’t pester them. And you only target friends who’ve expressed a clear connection to your style. You reach a dozen people in this way, but their level of commitment is much higher. This is high cost and high yield.

There’s a whole conversation that could spawn off from this about whether low cost / low yield strategies are worse than high cost / high yield. I’m not going to have that talk here. There are more informed writers on the subject (Liz being one) who can discuss it in depth. I bring up the cost/yield analysis to point out that the asshole strategy is a strategy. It’s a way of getting fans. It’s not something improvisers brainstormed to make our lives miserable, along with Being The Loudest at Parties, or Arguing With Director’s Notes.

Throwing Friends in the Boiler
Liz’s point (and the point of the Grindstone article she linked to) is that you shouldn’t cannibalize your friends to look for fans. My point is that you have to.

Granting that what Liz says is true – spamming your friends is annoying; it clutters the promotional space with noise; it has little chance of paying off – sacrificing the goodwill of your friends in order to get a few more seats in your audience sounds like a great way to lose friends. If this bothers you, that’s normal. It means you’re a human being.

But that’s a decision you have to confront regardless.

If you’re truly committed to art, you have to sacrifice a certain amount of friendship. This doesn’t always come in the form of annoying Facebook invites. But Louis C.K. has made a career out of calling his kids morons and his (now ex-) wife frigid. Picasso, the archetypal starving artist, must have bummed hundreds of meals off his friends during his “Blue Period.” Part-time performers with full-time jobs need to duck out of work early to get to rehearsal, leaving their coworkers to pick up the slack. And any writer knows that finishing a novel means turning down a lot of chances to drink with friends.

Every artist who’s passionate about their art has to reach the Art vs. Friendship crossroads. Most art is private in its composition, and all art is self-indulgent. Especially performance. To get up on a stage and not only demand everyone’s attention, but insist that you’re worth paying for, is so conceited. And friendship can’t long survive conceit.

At some point, you will grapple with your friends lying about whether they thought you were funny, or making up excuses not to come see your show, or talking behind your back about whether or not they think you’re any good. This does not mean they’re bad friends. All human beings do this. These are people who would help move your couch up three flights of stairs but who don’t want to see you fumble through another Harold variant. And they’ll be the best friends you ever had if you quit ditching their parties for your stupid rehearsals.

You will have to decide which you want more: your art or their friendship. If you stick with it, sweating out the open mics that no one comes to and the off-night shows that no one laughs at, you might one day find your voice on stage. If you abandon it, you get to have all your friends back. But the path to art is paved through your friends. You have to choose between friends and fans.

Conclusion
“Don’t” is not as useful a conversation as “should.” The self-promotion space will become more rewarding if performers evaluate competing strategies, not if everybody settles on one. Social media has slashed the cost of reaching everyone you’ve ever heard of. Liz might deplore the loud, lossy noise that fills our inboxes as a result (I certainly don’t love it). But while cheap is not a substitute for good, there’s still value to it. Especially if you’re an amateur performer, as most of our mutual friends are.

But more importantly, performers should not be afraid to reach out to me. Yes, yours is the sixth invite to an improv show I’ve received this week, and it’s only Wednesday. No, I’m probably not going. But keep telling me. Because one of these days I’ll have a free evening, and I’ll come see your show, and I’ll laugh and tell all my friends. If you don’t tell me, out of some concern for my bandwidth, I’ll never know. I don’t know whether your radio silence means you’re not spamming me or that you don’t have a show going on. In either case the result is the same: one less body in the audience.

1. Groupon’s Competitors Have Flooded The Market

The existence of a near dozen competitors – Groupon, LivingSocial, BuyWithMe, Dealfind, Tippr, Thrillist, Yipit, Jasmere, AtCost, DealMap, DealOn – isn’t a bad sign in and of itself. But it’s a bad sign when they’re nearly indistinguishable. What does Dealfind do that LivingSocial doesn’t? If this many companies with identical missions can find funding, then the market for “social coupons” is being overserved.

“But what if the demand is just that high?” you ask. It probably isn’t (see #4).

2. Groupon Gives You A Lien on Participating Businesses

Say you get a social coupon for a restaurant that expires in 6 months. What happens on day 181? Is the money you spent on the coupon lost?

Nope. Check the Groupon Terms & Conditions:

According to applicable law, the Merchant may be responsible for allowing you to redeem your Voucher for the cash value based on the money you actually paid for your Voucher (i.e. if you paid $20 for a Voucher which gives you $50 of value to the Merchant, the cash value that you paid is $20, not $50), for a period of time that extends beyond the expiration date on the Voucher. While the expiration date on the Voucher dictates the last date that you can use your Voucher at Merchant for the promotional offer stated on the Groupon, applicable law may provide that the Merchant is responsible for honoring the cash value that you paid for your Voucher for a period of time beyond the expiration date stated on the Voucher. In other words, you should be allowed to redeem the cash value (or purchase price) of your Voucher up until the greater of: (1) the Voucher’s expiration date; or (2) the minimum length of time allowed by applicable law for a Voucher to expire.

Meaning, if the coupon expires, you’re probably still entitled to its cash value up through a certain period. In Massachusetts, for example, that period is five years.

Do you, as a small business owner, want to put a whole bunch of five-year liabilities on your books? Is it worth that much to get some added foot traffic and Facebook cred?

Groupon clearly has enough customers who don’t mind this sort of thing. But all it’ll take is a few horror stories about businesses paying out for unclaimed coupons to start driving folks away.

3. Groupon Exposes The Margins

(I owe this point to Ilkka; can’t find the post, though)

You get an offer in the mail. $100 worth of accessories at a local boutique for $50. Your first reaction: “Sweet! What a great deal!” Your second reaction: “Why would I pay $100 for that many accessories under other circumstances?”

Offering a Groupon for your goods or services tells everyone who cares that you have a 50% margin built into your price. That’s not a crime; it’s not even a sin. But it does give away more information about your pricing structure than most business owners might consider wise.

For a service industry, like a massage spa or a beauty salon, this probably isn’t as big of a problem. But for retail stores? Do you want your customers to know that your sweaters are only worth half of what you charge?

4. Groupon Only Works Once

But let’s say, contrary to my points #2 and #3 above, Groupon turns out to be a success for your business. You move $10000 worth of fashion accessories at cost. In doing so, you build a word-of-mouth buzz that results in added foot traffic and more loyal customers. You’re thrilled with the results. Six months later, your Groupon sales rep calls you up and asks if you’d like to do another.

You laugh and hang up the phone.

What is the added value of a repeat Groupon? Why would anyone offer a Groupon for their business more than once? If it works, then you’ll have a new pool of loyal customers. If those new customers dwindle to nothing once the 50% coupon is no longer available – and anecdotal evidence suggests that’s common – then isn’t that solid evidence that Groupon didn’t work? And if your new pool of customers sticks with you, then why bother with another Groupon?

Unless I’m missing something, Groupon probably has zero customer retention. And considering the army of identical competitors, the pool of potential customers – small business owners who haven’t done Groupon once already – can only diminish over time. By 2013, everyone who’s interested in some sort of social coupon will probably have tried it.

Feb
23
Posted by Perich at 7:45 am

I have Mike to thank for pointing out Instapaper to me.

Add the Instapaper button to your browser’s toolbar. Then, every time you see a webpage you’d like to read later, click the “Read Later” button. Instapaper will automagically save it to your account in a format that preserves the text and some of the images.

You can even download your collected Instapaper articles in Kindle, ePub or easy printable formats. I have yet to take advantage of any of those, since I’d still have to drag the .mobi output to the Kindle, which means I’d need to plug it in, and since the USB cable only lives at my apartment, etc, etc.

That (to me) is not the best functionality. The best functionality is letting me read an article without dealing with shitty layout.

Gone are the days of a three-inch column surrounded by banner ads, skyscraper ads and unrolling GIFs. No more are those wasted years, clicking between pages of an online article in order to give a publisher more advertising impressions.* Now I just get pure, uncut content in one easy location.

Google Reader has provided me this functionality for years – thanks, Google! – but I had to subscribe to a feed first. If I don’t want to read every single “Politics” article on RollingStone.com (shocking, right?), I can just wait for FB/Twitter to recommend me the good ones.

So keep recommending, social mediacs! I’ve got something to read now.

____________________________
* I’m aware of the irony of someone who traffics banner ads for a living complaining about banner ads. You never have to ask if I’m aware of the irony. Besides, you don’t expect sanitation engineers to bring leftovers home with them.

I didn’t get the point of LivingSocial’s viral promotion on Wednesday, though that didn’t stop me from participating.

Buying a $20 Amazon gift card for $10 is, essentially, like buying a $20 bill for $10. Someone offers you this deal; your first instinct is to look for a catch. Your second: to act on it before the idiot changes their mind. Your third: to tell all your friends about the money launderer changing tens for twenties down by the bus stop.

My friend Jim pointed me to a blog post that explained all. As soon as I read the words “LivingSocial, the deal-a-day site in which Amazon just invested $175 million,” the tension in my mind eased. Not that I had any problem taking Amazon’s money. But business decisions – marketing decisions especially – have to make some kind of sense to me, or my head starts to hurt.

The beauty of Wednesday’s promotion was that it took advantage of the second and third instincts outlined above to vastly swell Living Social’s user base and market buzz. They made no effort to promote it, aside from possibly their daily e-mails to subscribers (not being a subscriber before Wednesday, I can’t say for certain). And yet, for a mere $13 million out of Amazon’s pocket, they triggered awareness and action in exactly the segment they need to target – online, deal-seeking, social-media-active people.

Compare that to Groupon’s big marketing push: their pre-game ad buy in the upcoming Super Bowl. No word yet on how much they spent, but considering inventory during the game itself goes for $3 million a slot, I’ll bet they paid near $13MM or more. (They would have bought time during the game, but all the commercial slots sold out in October).

Groupon’s the apex predator in the daily-deals market right now. If they’re going to grow market share at all, they need to reach people who traditionally don’t buy online coupons. Super Bowl viewers certainly encompass that audience (among others).

So Groupon’s trying to grow their market, while Living Social’s trying to poach the existing market away. Someone with better business savvy than I can decode which is the winning strategy. I’m happy to just pick up some free ten dollar bills.

The latest in a series of harmless things that offend me: the new Taco Bell Beefy Crunchy Burrito.

If you can’t see the YouTube embed, or if you can’t stand the suspense: it’s a burrito topped with Fritos.

At first this embarrassed me. What does it say of the paucity of the American dining experience that consumers would prefer a processed corn chip to the flavors that the processed corn chip represents? No, Mr. Bell, I don’t want a spicy, salty, crunchy topping for my burrito – I want some Fritos all up in there. It’s not as if the average Taco Bell burrito contained a lot of natural ingredients in the first place. But at least they weren’t competing by brand.

Having been raised by flavor barons, I can almost guarantee that this idea didn’t come from a lab. Some Taco Bell manager in Bozeman, MT, or Murfreesboro, TN, or Clinton, MS, kept seeing his patrons unwrap their burritos and drizzle a string of Fritos on them. The third time he saw it, he picked up the phone. Suddenly we have a new fast food taco offering across America.

Then again, I have to admire the ingenuity of the Frito-Lay corporation in inventing a way to classify taste. Taste and smell are the hardest senses to describe in words (I feel like I recommend Italo Calvino once every fifteen months, but Under the Jaguar Sun devotes specific attention to this problem). Frito-Lay gets around it by marrying a specific taste combination to a brand. Everyone in America but the Amish knows what a Frito tastes like. Taco Bell is just riding the wave.

They could describe their new Beefy Crunchy Burrito as “an awesrageous wave of spicy, salty, crunchy, beefy taste” and leave the audience guessing. Or they can say, “Hey, it’s topped with Fritos,” and everyone knows where they stand.

Still. A burrito topped with Fritos. This bothers me in a way the KFC Double Down doesn’t.