Periscope Depth

when rattlesnakes lose their skins, and their hearts

UC Davis pepper-spraying cop gets $38K for disability claim:

Former UC Davis police Lt. John Pike has been awarded $38,056 for psychiatric injuries he claimed to have suffered following a 2011 campus pepper-spraying incident that drew worldwide criticism.


Pike, who was later fired, filed a workers’ compensation claim saying he suffered depression and anxiety over the way he was treated in the wake of the incident.

A psychiatrist, who was agreed upon as an expert by both UC Davis and Pike’s attorney, found Pike suffers from a “moderate” disability and is therefore entitled to workers’ compensation benefits.

In a stipulated settlement entered Oct. 16, Administrative Law Judge Joel Harter ordered the University of California Regents to pay Pike $264.50 per week to reach the total payout, minus $5,700 in legal fees for Pike’s Sacramento attorney.

In my continual, perverse desire to put myself in the mindset of the unsympathetic, let’s consider the following:

(1) I won’t say “he was acting under orders” is a defense, because the 20th Century established that it shouldn’t be. But it’s not like Western society spent the years between Nuremberg and Occupy teaching people how to defy authority. So it’s a bit of a shock to do your job for years, do it well enough to become a Lieutenant, and then get fired for doing that job.

(2) This guy received a lot of attention from Anonymous and the like after the incident. The Internet hate machine, when it’s firing on all cylinders, can be pretty traumatic. I think it’s fair recompense for the callousness it takes to OC sitting children in the face, but that doesn’t mean I can watch it function without subdued horror.

So asking “does this guy deserve $38K or not?” is the wrong question. What we ought to be asking is “how was a system created that rewarded and promoted this guy up to the point where he thought it was okay to pepper-spray nonviolent protesters? And what can we do to change that system?” Because from an organizational standpoint alone, promoting this guy, firing him, and then rewarding him isn’t too efficient.

Comments are closed.